|
|
||||||||||
Kamayan para sa Kalikasan |
|||||||||||
FORUM OVERVIEW (click here) MAIN NEWS SECTION (right below) OTHER SECTIONS (click here)
FORUM
ECHOES
WE
ARE losing our heirloom as a people:
our natural environment, our culture, and whatever economic wealth
we have pro- duced and still have.
This is the clarion call raised by Dr.
Ernesto
R. Gonzales, spokesman and
president- elect of the National Economic Protectionism
Association (NEPA) as he
opened his
presentation
at last September’s
session
of the monthly Kamayan
para sa Kalikasan forum.
He explained to the participants why it would take an active
citizenry to defend our national and local community patrimony which
has been raised as an urgent call. |
FORUM FOCUS Small Groups of Super-Hardworkers Will Not Suffice Educate very effectively for much wider Green Activism THERE ARE SO MANY green organizations in the Philippines, but the members, volunteers, funded employees, and even the leaders of these groups and organizations have heed and meet the challenge to successfully educate more and more people to become active stakeholders in effective environmental conservation. Informing the citizenry on vital environmental and sustainable development issues is very important and the green groups have actually been doing this for decades. But aside from widely disseminating information, there has also been the need to educate enough people about basic science and also the basic ethic of actively and directly pursuing their own interests, instead of being strongly sympathetic but basically passive supporters of environmental efforts. |
|
.. |
DAY
OF MOURNING AND ACTION last Monday, October 14, with over a hundred marchers
on busy Taft Ave. in Manila, clad mostly in black, bringing to the Supreme
Court a petition to stop the implementation of the recently rat-ified JPEPA. Atty
Golda Benjamin (top left) of the Magkaisa-Junk JPEPA Coalition
reports to protesters after filing the petition with Akbayan Rep. Risa Hontiveros (showing a copy), and other leaders.
[KFJ
fotos by Ding Reyes]
|
Investing for Environmental Dividend AFTER DECADES
of environmental advocacy, we have not developed in the Philippines a national
constituency of true lovers of the environment who by their lifestyle and
behavior are true children of Mother Earth. So we must face the question:
“how do we get the action of more than 80 million Filipinos to have positive
impact on the environment?” Since
environmental education and appeals to moral responsibility have so
far had little effect, are we willing to try an approach that uses
income growth to restore moral capital and simultaneously produce the
desired environmental activism among the masses? As these are times of
difficulty and multiple crises, would it not be a waste to pass up the
opportunity offered by such an approach to social learning and communal
mobilization?. A
grand design will have these elements of strategy: Action has to be in
groups. Start with economic action that has significant impact on the
environment but is undertaken not on account of the environment but of
an urgent human need. The satisfaction of that need gets the action
done, with accompanying impact on the environment. Impact on the
environment may perhaps be even unintended on the part of the doer, but
intended in the grand design. The
benefit gained from the first act is expanded by investing part of the
money earned in a venture that is related to an environmental objective,
even one close to the first activity that had only indirect impact on
the environment (as far as most of the doers are concerned). This second
investment action, introduces the doer to an aspect of environmental
concern but which is only secondary to the benefits he can expect from
the investment. The
resulting incremental benefit makes the doer appreciative, if
incidentally, of the environmental element. He may not at this point
fully appreciate the value of the environmental impacts made from the
two economic activities he has invested in. On the next opportunity, the doer is invited to invest in a project that is openly an intervention for the environment but which equally offers financial returns just as in the first two instances. At this point it is natural for him to see the value of the investment from both the financial and environmental re wards
it will reap. As an investor, he will take pride and great concern for
the project’s success. In the meantime, the environmental value of
the first two investments, not earlier explained, will now become clear
to him. The investor will have become a fully pro-environment citizen. Four
important things are to be noted in this outline of strategy:
(1)
The
environmental objectives were served by the projects invested
in, even if the educational outcome was deliberately designed to follow
later and as a matter of consequence, not a precondition. (2)
Meeting
the person’s need was the priority, thus proving he is valued,
and therefore ethical and moral imperatives were predominant and were
actualized, and the environmental sensitivity only gradually instilled
by a form of osmosis. (3)
The
environmental content focused on the really urgent aspects of
environmental catastrophe needing to be addressed by society today and
was thus not cluttered with a lot of details less urgent. Although the
environmental urgency is not pressed at the start, (human need and human capital are the major focus) the value
of the environmental outcomes as they impact on human need and human
capital are inescapably grasped without the need for elaborate
analysis. (4)
The
beneficial experience will exceed any explanation and lead to action. Lamenting
environmental damage and finding those who are to blame have not
necessarily led to massive action. Economic gains, with environmental
dividend will have a better chance. In
summary, we can build the national constituency of an
environment-committed citizenry through a social learning process that
employs economic strategies deliberately designed to result in
predetermined environmental impact and restoration or affirmation of
human worth and society’s moral capital. The hard times ought to get
us results in less than a year! (Requests for workshop on details of the strategy accepted through Kamayan Forum and NepaSERV). ( A.C.)
|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
FORUM FOCUS Small Groups of Super-Hardworkers Will Not Suffice Educate very effectively for much wider Green Activism THERE ARE SO MANY green organizations in the Philippines, but the members, volunteers, funded employees, and even the leaders of these groups and organizations have heed and meet the challenge to successfully educate more and more people to become active stakeholders in effective environ- mental conservation. Informing the citizenry on vital environmental and sustainable development issues is very important and the green groups have actually been doing this for decades. But aside from widely disseminating information, there has also been the need to educate enough people about basic science and also the basic ethic of actively and directly pursuing their own interests, instead of being strongly sympathetic but basically passive supporters of environmental efforts. We
clarify that education is not to be equated to schooling. The
aspect most relevant
to us for this coming forum
session is the quality content of real education. And the aspect
most relevant to this coming forum session is the quality content of
education. Green
groups are even challenged by the situation to officially include
this work as part of their basic tasks, even if only for their
specific green advocacies. Let all our advocacy-based alliances grow
tremendously in number as reinforced by teeming numbers of
newly-motivated, newly-self-activated stakeholders that can make
their collective pressure strongly felt by policy-makers. For
this reason, the organizers of the Kamayan
para sa Kalikasan monthly environmental forum chose to focus
the 224th session scheduled for this coming October 17, the topic of
“Effective
Education for the Environment,” where the teachers would
be everybody and the target students should be everybody. We invited the following to join the panel of speakers or send their qualified representatives: Nick Briones of the Environment Education Network of the Philippines (EENP); Prof. Rosario “Inday” Wood, head of the Science Department of Miriam College, Quezon City; Roy Cabonegro, secretary of Partido Kalikasan Institute; and Auchie Villaraza, who heads a learning institute for pre-school children. Freed from her forum moderating duties during this session, Marie Marciano of Mother Earth Foundation will join the panel to share her experiences in giving inner ecology seminars. . |
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
FORUM ECHOES Echoes From September Forum Calls for Defense of Patrimony Urgent WE
ARE losing our heirloom as a people:
our natural environment, our culture, and whatever economic wealth
we have pro- duced and still have.
This is the clarion call raised by Dr. Ernesto R. Gonzales, spokesman and
president-elect of the Na tional Economic Protectionism Association
(NEPA) as he
opened his presentation at last September’s session of the monthly Kamayan
para sa Kalikasan forum.
He explained to the participants why it would take an active
citizenry to defend our national and local community patrimony which
has been raised as an urgent call.
Another
panel speaker, Ed Aurelio Reyes of the Kaisahan sa Kamalayan sa
Kasaysayan (Kamalaysayan) underscored the value of “taking the
long view” of developments in the lifestyles and conditions of
entire communities and the entire nation to see the prevalent
directions and discern the appropriate courses of action that the
people to take to effectively defend our patrimony for present and
future generations. With Reyes in the panel of resource speakers, Marie R. Marciano teamed up with KFJ Editor Tony Cruzada for the moderating. Dr.
Gonzales, who is also executive vice president of the Pateros River
Basin Organization (PatRiBOrg), underscored the inseparable links
among the three elements of the sustainable development tripod that
has to be jealously guarded by the community itself, in the face
of what has come to be called “development aggression.” The three are the cultural, natural and economic resources that rightfully belong to the community since way back to the times of its ancestors, and all the way forward to many generations of its descendants. Gonzales
said: “The Era of Industrialization of the Planet Earth (18th to
20th Century) had reached the dead end beset with imbalances in
planetary ecology and obliteration of communities dependent upon the
public domain of the commons. In
principle the “commons” is the patrimony of free nation
states.” This also applies to every community,” he added.
“In
countries where national integrity
is kept intact, patrimony consisted both the public domain commons
and its economic capitalization through wealth creation of their
corporate conglomerates. through the Third World which are
primarily dependent upon the ‘Economy of the Commons’ which is
literally destroyed by economic industrialization due to pollution
and political dominations of poorer states. For his part, Prof. Reyes of Kamalaysayan emphasized the keen sense of history of each stakeholder community needed to take the long view of the changes in their lifestyles for better or for worse, and the needed will power to collectively take effective steps to preserve what is theirs. They first have to know exactly and very clearly who they are. |
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
OTHER ITEMS You may now join Kamayan forum wherever you may be! THE
18.5-year-old Kamayan para sa Kalikasan monthly environmental forum has
expanded its base of possible participants via the wonder of internet. People who live far from NCR where the forum is hosted every month by Kamayan Restaurant-EDSA, those who cannot come due to schedule conflicts, and even those who plan to come to attend but want to post their comments. They
just have to open this web site, www.kamayanforum.8m.net,
and click at the link to the “NEXT KAMAYAN SESSION” to read
the explanation and questions, read the comments earlier posted, and post
their own responses in the “Feedback box” at the very bottom. Ten environment organization leaders, one of them based in Davao, and another in Cavite, were the first two website-based participants of the forum, via this facility. They are Cavite-based Cornel Bongco, Lia Esquillo of Davao City, Ernie Gonzales of Pateros; and Lodel Magbanua and Roy Cabonegro, who are both based in Rodriguez, Rizal; Rene Pineda and Esther Pacheco; Angelina Galang; Edward Sta. Ana; and Auchee Villaraza. They are leaders of Clear Communicators for the Environment (CLEAR), Task Force Against Aerial Spraying (TFAAS), Pateros River Basin Organization (PatRiBOrg), Indigenous People’s Links (PIPLinks); Partido Kalikasan Institute (PKI), Concerned Citizens Against Pollution (COCAP), Miriam College, Kilusang Lakas Pamayanan, and Creative Space, respectively. (Their posted comments are in Special Item 2 below.) |
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
SPECIAL ITEM 1 (Not included in KFJ hard-copy edition) More fotos from anti-JPEPA March, Oct. 13, 2008 (KFJ fotos by Ding Reyes)
|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
SPECIAL ITEM 2 (Not included in KFJ hard-copy edition) On-line Comments (Received Before October 17, session date)
|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
BACKPAGE.AD
|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
|